I started day 2 with the Gray Institute presentation.
I already had a good idea what to expect being familiar with Gary Gray’s approach. The word functional is used heavily throughout. They also use terms such as tranformational zones which if you know what the stretch-shortening cycle is (eccentric to isometric to concentric) then you have an understanding of what they mean.
They also promote the use of drivers which is their term for using movements of distal body parts or movements performed away from the targeted body part to elicit activation of certain muscle groups.
Example: if you want to fire the right glutes, step forward with the right foot, shift your pelvis to the right, and reach up and over to the left with your right arm.
The ultimate goal is to activate without isolating the hip much like during functional activities. Makes sense but unless you plan to devote a long period of study into their methods, I think there’s easier ways to approach it. (someone call Gray Cook)
One point I respectfully disagree with is that we must train at the extreme joint angles such as those that bring the ACL under maximum tension (closed-chain pronation, knee valgus, and hip internal rotation). Their theory is that if you can train the body at these joint angle then the athlete, having already been exposed to the angle, will be able to recover from it and actually prevent the ACL injury in the first place.
Well, it’s virtually impossible to expose an athlete to all possible angles, postures, and body positions they’d be exposed to during competition. Better to actually practice their sport. Doing exercises as slow speeds and light loads, even if the joint angles are the same as the sport, is not the same as doing them at high speeds and high loads.
Still, if you want to see how the entire body “functions” during movement, Gary Gray’s stuff is worth a look.
More McGill and superstiffness. This was an expansion of how the superstiffness is applied in sport and training. He showed the Bruce Lee one inch punch as an example of how force is created centrally in the trunk muscles and then displayed with a low amplitude, high force movement. Dr. McGill asked the audience if anyone was applying this concept in other ways. How ’bout oscillatory isometrics, drop training??
Went to see Sue Falsone from Athlete’s Performance. I want to see how the integrated all their therapy and training. Quite the set up from what I could tell. The audience pulled her off track a bit with questions about insurance coverage, but it was still good to see how they integrated the different aspects of their business.
Caught a few minutes of Mike Boyle’s Advance Program Design talk. You should have his DVD set on the same topic. Wha??? You don’t? Get it.
Al Vermeil was next. Here’s the only strength coach with world championship in 2 major professional sports. One (actually several) with the San Francisco 49’ers (He’s up there talking about working with Bill and then you realize he’s talking about Bill Walsh) and the other with the Chicago Bulls. I’d have paid to hear him just talk about working with Micheal Jordan for an hour.
He didn’t, but instead reviewed Mark Comerfords’ approach to spinal stability. This approach is the polar opposite to Dr. McGill’s. Where Dr. McGill would tell you that which muscle is more important will depend on the activity, the approach that Coach Vermeil presented falls into the inner unit (TVA, multifidus, diaphragm, pelvic floor) vs. the outer unit (abs, erectors, etc.).
He’s personal friends with Comerford and Hodges and he used this approach to help his wife with a long-term back problem. Makes sense that he should feel strongly about this approach.
Ryan Lee wrapped up the day. There is no one that has done more to improve the business lives of personal trainers and strength coaches. He presented on how to create unlimited passive income streams. I’ve seen it before but it was great to hear it again. He was also kind enough to plug my (and Mike Robertson’s) DVD (available at www.inside-out-warm-up.com). The thing about what Ryan has to offer is that it’s not BS theory. There are too many real-world examples of trainers that he has helped become more successful.
Post Summit activities…
Beers with Mike Boyle, Alwyn Cosgrove, Chris Poirier, Eric Cressey, Mike Robertson, Annette Lang, Nancy from Noblesville (right down the street from my house), and a host of others. Then off to dinner and drinks.
Side note: Spent a good portion of the evening talking to Rob Pilger of www.pilgerstrainingsystems.com. I dont’ think there’s anyone who knows more about boxing than Rob. He knows boxing and he knows how to train. He mentioned that he’s got a series of training DVD’s coming soon. I’m buyin’.
One more day to go!
Bill